these_balls: (SERIOUS MOD BUSINESS)
Route 29: mods ([personal profile] these_balls) wrote in [community profile] route_292011-10-11 04:15 pm

A NEW RULE APPEARS

Hey, Route!

Yes, more new stuff. Everything chaaanges, chaaaanges, it's evolutionary~

1) New apps rule!:
In the interest of clarity and app processing speed, we now ask that potential applicants post their application in comments rather than linking. If the app contains explicit references to 'hard' spoilers (think big reveals, like 'Dumbledore dies', I SEE DEAD PEOPLE, I am your father etc), players should put the application in their own journal or their character's journal and link it, making sure to mention the presence of spoilers within.

We've always gotten linked apps (goodness knows I'm guilty of linking an app or five that was spoiler-free!), but having them all on the page means the mods don't have to open a million tabs while processing, and spoiler links keep fellow players from stumbling onto things that might ruin a canon for them.

This is a rule; as of today (the 11th of October), if your app is linked but not marked for spoilers, it will not be processed that week. We trust all our players will read and abide by the rules list, which has not changed besides this.

2) Polling about the passwords:
RELAX, we're not changing anything concerning passwords...yet. But we're thinking it's about time this thing got an overhaul, don't you think?

Our proposed fix: What we'd like to do is remove the passwords altogether and replace them with something of a task system: on the rules and FAQ pages, tasks such as 'explain in one sentence how your character feels about strawberries in their personality section' or 'include a link to your favorite youtube video in the canon links section'.

The goal here is to make sure people have at least given a cursory visit to both pages. These tasks would change arbitrarily and be located arbitrarily within the FAQ and rules. Yes, these would be more work for you, and for us, but the current password system feels outdated and obvious.

Your turn: How do you feel, Route? Hate this idea? Love passwords? Have a better idea? Let us know!

[Poll #1785767]


If you have grievances, comments, suggestions or ideas concerning either the new app rule or the password system, you can: PM the mod account, PM any of us individually, catch us on AIM, or post (anonymously or not) to our (screened) Suggestions post.

Looking forward to hear from you!
noodlegoggles: (Default)

>:3 fufufufu

[personal profile] noodlegoggles 2011-10-11 04:48 pm (UTC)(link)
It's okay! I had a feeling that was it~ And yeah, I remember that happening to Harry Potter and some of the Homestuck apps when they linked to the official MSPA site. I'm sorry for not being persistent enough about getting the word out that privacy settings were fixed, I think LJ was having one of it's... moments at the same time :|a but yes, sorry about that! They're all fixed now :'>

[identity profile] usedrage.livejournal.com 2011-10-11 04:58 pm (UTC)(link)
... When is LJ not having one of its moments >___>;;
foreveraclone: (Default)

[personal profile] foreveraclone 2011-10-11 05:58 pm (UTC)(link)
oh god that's a good question, I don't even.... >_>a

[identity profile] usedrage.livejournal.com 2011-10-11 07:23 pm (UTC)(link)
And for the record, while I will probably bitch and moan in the future about how ugly apps look on the comments page when they're all nice and pretty in my journals, I do think the linking thing is a good idea.

There's pros and cons for either side, as I said in another thread, but in the end I do think it's a lot easier for the mods and is less prone to misunderstanding. It'd be super easy for someone to edit a journal they linked to and go OH MAN THIS REJECTION WAS TOTALLY UNFAIR, or for misunderstandings on anoncomm like the recent one. At the same time, I've seen people get pending notices and rather than respond to it with the revisions, go back and change it, and I can understand that this makes it hell for the mods to judge when they can't see where the changes are--and I don't think it should be up to them to save copies.

I'm fairly against email applications, as well, as I've never had any really good experiences with the concept and more often than not I've spent a week going "holy shit what if I got the wrong email address." I also like to see what applications are judged on, prepare myself for possible castmates, and to watch the progression of applications on Saturday nights because I have nothing better to do. This is a bizarre hobby. I know. Don't judge me. The email thing i just my experience and opinion, but I figure I'll put it out there.

Like I said below, there's a bunch of pros and cons and while I prefer linking applications, I can see why you guys would put this policy into effect. It's a lot of hassle on your end and can catch other players up into misunderstandings and drama. It's ugly, sure, but we only have to do it once. There's character limits, also sure. But they can be avoided by breaking things down i nto smaller sections before posting the application. And there is app theft (and i know a stupid amount of people who've had their apps stolen for other games), but people can steal apps from our journals, too :\

My only complaint about it aside from LJ's stupid link policy is that maybe the date for the change should've been posted sometime before the change. Everyone should follow the policy immediately, yes, but some people might miss this post. It might've been better to start on the next app cycle, and post a warning on the page--"Applications after 12:00 AM, EST on October 16th must be posted in the comments. As of October 16th, any applications linked from journals without spoiler tags will not be processed until the following application cycle." It gives us time to adjust, and people who've read the post would be able to follow the policy.

... If that last part sounds busybodyish, I don't mean it to. I just have some trouble saying things right, and using examples tends to be how I roll.

This is all just my opinion and you don't have to take it into account, and I really have no clue why I spent so much tl;dr explaining support of something, but I figure if I'm going to disagree, I might as well explain why I agree with what I do?
foreveraclone: (Default)

[personal profile] foreveraclone 2011-10-11 10:18 pm (UTC)(link)
While it would take whoever is in charge of app chat that night the five or so seconds it would take to click on the application to get the character's name and their starter (and to make sure that the applicant has the right password/using the right application form) the applicant could also spend that time posting said application. It makes things run smoother for us, and helps get the acceptance/pending/rejection notices out somewhat on time. Five AM applications, never again. And it could also stop those kinds of misunderstandings from happening again. By the time I saw that thread the problem had already been solved. In fact I kind of head-titled at it a little because I knew their samples were in the post when we worked on applications.

And yes, there is always the fact that people will fix their revisions inside their entry, and to my knowledge the people who have linked their application and were pended for something in the past usually respond to the pending notice with said corrections. But, there could always be the case that they don't tell us. Pendings are always the first thing that gets done in application chats. If we don't see any response to the pending notification, then we move on.

I think you can rest easy on the email application bit? If route were smaller I could see it working, but as it isn't-- keeping up with email applications on top of every other comment the mods tend to get on a daily basis can be quite taxing. And as you've mentioned, there is always the off chance that it could be somehow sent to spam, or someone could have botched the mod email before sending it, or the applicant's acceptance/pending/rejection notification somehow ended up in their spam folder and so on and so forth.

And while I'm just a tech mod and can't really pass any rules/have my word be the word of a modly God, I can always bring your thoughts up to Ara or the others! Every opinion counts, after all~



oh gosh, I hope this was okay /)A(\ ara you can jump back in whenever you want-- I just wanted to let Hat know that the screening links problem was fixed since I knew about it ;^;

[identity profile] usedrage.livejournal.com 2011-10-11 10:37 pm (UTC)(link)
ffff i actually didn't know where to put this so i was kinda like "oh look. a... thread /puts at end."

I just kinda wanted to voice my opinion since I saw other people being against the choice and I had a lot of thoughts on it and i figured all the mod-san's would see it here so... haha, IM SORRY FOR TEXT WALLING AT YOU.